WHO reveals almost entire global population breathing unhealthy air
By Niamh Macdonald
Almost the entire global population (99 per cent) breathes air that exceeds World Health Organization (WHO) air quality limits, and threatens their health, according to the 2022 update of WHO air quality database.
The new air quality database, released on 4 April, is the most extensive yet in its coverage of air pollution exposure on the ground. The database now includes measurements of annual mean concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), a common urban pollutant and measurements of particulate matter with diameters equal or smaller than 10 μm (PM10) or 2.5 μm (PM2.5).
A record number of over 6,000 cities in 117 countries are now monitoring air quality, revealing how their populations are breathing unhealthy levels of fine particle matter and nitrogen dioxide. The data also shows that people in low and middle-income countries are suffering the highest exposures.
A worsening health emergency
The database demonstrates the threat of air pollution to human health. Particulate matter is capable of penetrating deep into the lungs and entering the bloodstream which can cause cardiovascular, stroke and respiratory impacts. There is also emerging evidence that particulate matter impacts other organs and causes other diseases.
Nitrogen dioxide is associated with respiratory diseases, particularly asthma, which lead to respiratory symptoms, such as coughing or difficulty breathing. This further leads to increased hospital admissions and visits to emergency rooms.
Dr Maria Neira, WHO Director, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Health, said: “After surviving a pandemic, it is unacceptable to still have 7 million preventable deaths and countless preventable lost years of good health due to air pollution. That’s what we’re saying when we look at the mountain of air pollution data, evidence, and solutions available. Yet too many investments are still being sunk into a polluted environment rather than in clean, healthy air.”
Last year, WHO responded to the growing evidence base for the significant harm caused by even low levels of many air pollutants by revising its Air Quality Guidelines. The guidelines were made more stringent, especially for Nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter, an action that was supported by the health community, medical associations and patient organisations.
Now, through the 2022 database WHO aims to monitor the state of the world’s air and feed into progress tracking of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Commenting on the report, Francesco Tamilia, Policy Analyst at Public Policy Projects and author of The climate crisis and its impacts report said: “The science and data are increasingly clear on the extreme threat air pollution poses on human health, damaging every organ in the human body. World Health Organization has done an incredible job revising its Air Quality Guidelines last year, making them more rigorous. The latest air quality database is another important step in measuring the damaging affects air pollution has on the population’s health.
“National governments have no excuses, either they implement those guidelines and avert millions of premature deaths, or they will knowingly neglect the health of their populations.”
More support needed for “fatigued” social care workforce
By Mary Brown
On the 16th March 2022, Public Policy Projects (PPP) hosted an evidence session entitled The Social Care Workforce: Averting a Crisis as part of its report series The Future of Social Care. PPP’s Social Care Network examines the most urgent issues facing social care and presents tangible solutions to address workforce challenges in the sector.
The crisis facing the social care sector is fundamentally a workforce one. The sector itself is a large employer in the UK, employing about 1.54 million people, equivalent to five per cent of the workforce. As one participant noted, “the sector itself is a huge contributor to the economy and to society”. Given that staff pay is the single biggest expenditure faced by care homes, workforce management should be front and centre whenever system finances are being considered.
Even before the pandemic, there were about 112,000 social care vacancies in England, with jobs paying only £8.50 an hour. Following the pandemic, the vacancy figures are assumed to be worse. Key issues driving individuals away from working in the social care sector include low pay, stressful working conditions and a low sense of worth.
A participant of the evidence session emphasised that the working conditions of the social care sector have led to 74 per cent of care professionals reporting that they regularly experience stress at work, an average number of sick days 25 per cent above the national average, and a staff turnover rate significantly higher than the national average.
As phrased by one participant, social care is suffering from a “fatigued workforce” not only due to the pressures of the pandemic, but issues which have existed within the sector for much longer. The problems within the social care workforce are chronic , and are considered by many to constitute a crisis. As one participant said, “clearly a workforce strategy is one of the absolute essentials that we need to have to make a success of the sector over the next decade or so”.
“The social care sector should work alongside recruitment organisations to recruit young, bright people into social care, and help them consider where a career may lead.”
One problem identified was narrow recruitment to the sector. It was stressed that within social care, “we should cast our nets wider in a recruitment approach… and recruit not only people with previous experience”. The social care sector should work alongside recruitment organisations to recruit young, bright people into social care, and help them consider where a career may lead.
It was also suggested that more effort must be made to recruit hard-to-reach and underemployed groups, including people living with disabilities, and immigrant workers. “What frustrates me is that there are individuals in these groups who can be wonderful, caring staff [but]are missed, because hiring managers are too narrow in their focus”, said one participant.
Staff retention rates in social care are low. Network members noted that social care workers often leave the sector for other, similarly paid jobs, such as retail roles, while few choose to leave and work for the NHS. One network member identified that “between care assistants in the NHS and the social care sector, there is around a 23 per cent deficit in social care. The terms and conditions are vastly better in the NHS. Pensions, sick pay, overtime and unsocial hours all contribute to that deficit.”
Essentially, social care workers are underpaid and undervalued. For both better recruitment and retention, social care workers must be appropriately paid and treated as though they are valued. Some network members identified low pay as the key driver for individuals choosing to leave the social care workforce, and yet, it was emphasised that social care is a both a skilled and psychologically demanding profession, and should be commensurately well-paid.
However, funding in the system is limited, and paying the workforce is the sector’s single biggest expense. One participant said “there is not a settlement from government or local government that actually meets the cost of care to enable us to pay a proper wage for the level of skill, ability, responsibility, dedication that [care workers] have”. Furthermore, a high proportion of social care workers are on zero-hours contracts; in London, this figure stands at 41 per cent of social care workers. Therefore, many social care workers have to deal with pay inconsistency and insecurity, on top of being low-paid.
“Network members were in agreement that social care is, and should be publicly regarded as, a skilled profession.”
While pay is regularly described as the most pressing issue in the workforce, one participant argued that in their experience of conducting exit interviews with workers, it is not low pay, but rather a low sense of worth which leads people to leave the profession. While higher pay is one way in which care workers can be practically appreciated, it was agreed that more must be done to value care work both by improving the public image of care workers and ensuring that internal structures provide support and give value to workers.
Network members were in agreement that social care is, and should be publicly regarded as, a skilled profession. “It is not the kind of job that everyone can do,” said one participant. “It is a skilled job, which requires the creation of quality human relationships and working with people who have complex care needs… it is a real skill and should be regarded as the same as working in health.”
Social work is challenging and worthy of respect, all participants agreed. One commented that “no two days in social care will be the same; you have to be agile and move with that, so it does take very special people to take those roles”. The public status of social care work must be elevated to reflect this, and the workforce to feel appropriately valued if these retention issues are to be effectively addressed.
Securing an integrated future
For a supported workforce, good leadership is essential. One participant noted that in the social care system “there is a varied approach to leadership”, and good leadership is not always evident in the system. Given the demanding nature of social care work, it is essential that carers feel well supported in their roles. One participant added that “workers do not stay because of a good job, they stay because of a good manager”, and therefore, proper leadership training must be a central goal of the workforce plan.
A practical solution suggested by one of the network members to combat low recruitment, retention and the poor image of the profession was a ‘social-care-first’ scheme, mirroring the successful teach-first scheme. Many other sectors have emulated the ‘teach-first’ template with great success. The aim of the scheme is to engage with young people to consider social care work as a career by espousing the value of a career in care. Such a scheme would emphasise how care work has the potential to transform the lives of dependent individuals, and the importance and value in building personal relationships with system users, improving the image of the profession. As part of the scheme, there should also be structured leadership, coaching and mentoring training, for the purpose of also transforming the quality of social care. This may serve to solve some of the leadership issues in the sector, as young and bright individuals will be well trained to manage and lead social care in the future.
Now that the NHS and social care are moving towards integration, participants noted that for a true and fair integration of the systems, employees should be paid and treated equally. One participant called for a joint recruitment scheme for the NHS and social care, with equal pay offered. It was also emphasised that NHS workers receive many ‘perks’, particularly since the start of the pandemic, which social care workers do not (including food and drinks discounts from certain companies).
Other suggestions to aid the integration of the NHS and social care workforce included social care placements and secondments for NHS staff, in which they are exposed to social care, and the richness and value of social care work. The status of care work must be elevated for proper integration of the two systems can occur, in order that social work and NHS work can be equally respected.
A large part of the discussion focused on the role of volunteers within the social care sector, and the value they bring to both paid carers and system users. Volunteers are an invaluable part of the social care workforce given that they reduce pressure on care workers, improve patient experiences, facilitate higher quality of care to drive better health outcomes, and strengthen community connections. One participant said that in the context of social care, “volunteering is a public health tool. There is a body of medical research which talks about the huge benefits for mental health and physical wellbeing for patients”. Volunteers also serve to raise the visibility of the social care sector.
Since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, the UK has seen an unprecedented rise in the numbers of people volunteering in their local communities. During the pandemic, the UK had 12.4 million people volunteering in their local communities. 4.6 million of these were first-time volunteers. Currently, the UK has a window of opportunity to make the most of the interest in volunteering to reduce the immense pressure on care workers.
As part of the workforce strategy, there needs to be investment to drive the volunteer sector, for the wellbeing of the social care system and its users. However, time is undoubtedly of the essence; as one participant emphasised, “there is an urgency to the conversation we are having. As Covid dissipates, what we don’t want is for people to go back into the corners of their community and not come out again to contribute.”
How integrated care systems can improve digital inclusion
By Gabriel Blaazer
Sarah Boyd, Head of Digital Experience and Transformation at Norfolk & Waveney Health and Social Care Partnership (NWHSCP), explores how her integrated care system (ICS) is using digital health to improve patient inclusion and help reduce health inequalities.
Health inequality is a growing problem but is still too often discussed separately from the core business of the NHS. Patients are treated through siloed care pathways, with conversations about why some populations have poorer health outcomes often treated as an aside.
The pandemic brought this into greater focus, especially around digital inclusion. Technology rolled out across the NHS in response to Covid-19 often widened the gap between those who could access online services and those who couldn’t.
The benefits of ICSs
When it comes to digital inclusion, there is little doubt that ICSs offer a huge opportunity to deliver more equitable access to healthcare and improved health outcomes for those previously underserved by the health system.
NWHSCP is a new type of organisation, working as a system across the Norfolk and Waveney region. Operating across the public sector, along with health and social care, councils and with voluntary organisations, presents an opportunity tackle health inequality and exclusion in a person-centred way.
The ICS allows health leaders to work across organisational boundaries, to test assumptions about exclusion, and to leverage the work that happens at the level of individual places.
Fixing existing digital inequalities
At every stage, NWHSCP are ensuring that their digital projects address digital inequalities. By implementing a pan-public sector hub-and-spoke model that provides personalised support to excluded groups, their plan is to gain the wider benefits of digital inclusion by engaging people – not only in health services – but more broadly in society.
For example, if a GP detects that an elderly person in their care is socially isolated, they can refer them to a central digital inclusion service. From there, they may be passed to a library or volunteer service who are able to provide connectivity or a 5G-enabled device, along with the ongoing support to use it. This allows the patient to order repeat prescriptions, but also to food shop online or video call family and friends, with positive benefits for their wider health and wellbeing.
“Creating an environment in which every service is digitally inclusive offers benefits not just to individuals, but also to wider society”
Asking people to go to an appointment at an unfamiliar location can create unnecessary barriers. As it proceeds, the ambition of NWHSCP is to work towards using services that people already access to provide a trusted contact point. If patients are already known to a church group or domestic violence shelter, for example, they might receive support there.
Through community partnerships, ICSs can build a network of digital tools and skill provision. For example, if a partially-sighted person, or family member, needs a speech-to-text reader, NWHSCP can point them towards their trusted toolkit. Once a person has access to this network, they can then download tools freely, ahead of their health needs.
Building an inclusive service
Creating an environment in which every service is digitally inclusive offers benefits not just to individuals, but also to wider society. As the Good Things Foundation’s Widening Digital Participation report found in March 2020, digital inclusion pays for itself in better mental and physical health, and stronger participation in the economy. For every pound spent, £6.20 is made back.
With this in mind, ICSs can leverage skills found in the private sector to identify new ways to increase inclusivity. Companies in the space include ThriveByDesign and CardMedic, an award-winning digital tool that provides instant access to communications options to improve engagement with healthcare professionals.
CardMedic is designed to help patients with a language barrier, visual, hearing or cognitive impairment, or to communicate through PPE and is unique in its space.
One issue with digital inclusivity tools is that they’re often seen as only affecting excluded communities, but digital inclusivity applies to everyone. Many people often struggle to retain emotionally-sensitive medical information, such as details about a cancer diagnosis. Tools like CardMedic allow any patient to review the basics of a hospital procedure or consultation – helping them to feel more secure in their care.
Applying innovation
Through pulling together with public sector and voluntary organisations, NWHSCP has built a strong, interconnected and multi-disciplinary team to implement their digital transformation agenda. As ICSs move towards statutory footing, the hope is to build on their initial successes though good recruitment and the implementation of innovative technology.
But there is only so much one system organisation can achieve on its own. To maximise the potential of integrated care systems, the NHS will require a national system for picking up on digital innovation. It should not be up to individual ICSs to find products, such as CardMedic, themselves. Digital inclusivity should be available to all.
Taking practical steps to address a growing crisis in domiciliary care
By Gabriel Blaazer
John Bryant, Head of Strategy and Development for Torbay Council, outlines a series of practical steps to enhance the role of the care worker and address the growing crisis in domiciliary care.
The solution to the domiciliary care crisis is to enable the sector to do more, not to simply ask more of it. The distinction is important, as the development of integrated care provides opportunities to enhance system efficiency like never before. And yet, the scope of what could be asked of, and performed by, trained, supported, committed community-based practitioners is yet to be fully explored or achieved.
All the while, the expectations of those receiving care, and certainly those considering a future career in health and care, are greater than they have ever been.
To meet these ever-rising expectations, system leaders are likely to find fertile ground in looking to better embrace the assets that already exist within the system. This includes domiciliary care workers, whose skillset could be expanded and developed, a move that could encourage others into the system. This can happen by re-positioning the expectation, skills and rewards to produce and provide, for example, enhanced wellbeing services (EWS) provided by enhanced wellbeing practitioners (EWP), of which domiciliary care is a major component among a portfolio of beneficial interventions and service provision.
The 6Cs of care are prevalent within our frontline domiciliary partner staff; the opportunity is there to optimise their engagement and knowledge of patients and clients to:
Support retention and recruitment
Respond to the discharge and reablement challenges
Drive early intervention and prevention
Offer a developed interface with general practice
Engage with population health management
The support of these four key drivers for public service change: politics, policy, measurement and money, are positioning us as never before to achieve success. The government’s social care reform white paper, People at the Heart of Care, connects to the £5.4 billion pledged for adult social care reform between 2022 to 2025. It is notable that healthcare is a major beneficiary of this funding in early years, however within the policy of integrated care the opportunity exists to bring about radical, beneficial system reform from the outset.
“Together, these measures aim to put people at the heart of social care and move us towards our 10-year reform vision.”
(Department of Health and Social Care, 2022).
These themes were also present in the subsequent integration white paper, Joining up Care for People, Places and Populations. The measures set out in the paper provide clear areas of opportunity, focus and policy support.
A growing crisis
These government white papers are in no small part a response to a care crisis the likes of which we have never seen. One key element of that is domiciliary care, the unseen service that is delivered behind the front doors of our communities to keep people safe, comfortable, medicated and cared-for. For over a decade the policy has been to bring care closer to home, and the People at the Heart of Care paper reinforces that. The Covid-19 pandemic has compounded the need to ensure people are cared for and supported in this way, minimising their movement between different health settings to reduce infection risk.
“The endeavours of care providers to recruit at this level should be celebrated alonside any other part of the system that has been able to do the same”
Present estimates indicate that there is a care shortage/vacancy rate of 17 per cent which equates to at least 100,000 jobs based on Skills for Care data in England. Given the challenges in recruitment felt by providers, there can often be a projection that care providers are not ’good‘ at recruitment. However, in looking behind the headlines we find that in one area, Torbay, care providers have increased their capacity through recruitment by 39 per cent in the 18 months leading to September 2021. The problem is that the demand for their services has totally outstripped this staffing influx, increasing by 47 per cent in the same time period. This trend is consistent across the country’s health and care ecosystem.
The endeavours of care providers to recruit at this level should be celebrated alongside any other part of the system that has been able to do the same. If organisations who have been able to recruit as well as Torbay have done are finding it difficult, is it probable that any other part of the system will do better?
The Health Foundation recently published research suggesting that over a million more health and care staff will be needed in the next decade to meet growing demand for care. What is clear is that these shortages were well established trends before the Covid-19 pandemic. If the challenge of capacity is to be permanently addressed, then retention followed by recruitment is essential – as any marketing of roles from ‘the system’ will be trumped by the messages communicated by those working in or leaving the services.
Recognising a new future, communicating that and providing examples of what could be achieved will produce opportunities for beneficial results.
Practical steps
In this respect, returning to the domiciliary care issue, what might emerge if we were to turn the issue on its head?
To address the crisis currently seen in domiciliary care, I propose a series of practical steps to enhance the role of the care worker and to use the ICS framework to transform system level efficiency:
Addressing the domiciliary care shortage: expand the potential of the service and provide those delivering it with more responsibility and control by becoming EWPs
Supporting the community nursing challenge: offer them the opportunity to have a wider team of EWPs at their disposal; enable them to work to the top of their licence
To address GP availability: create neighbourhood teams of EWPs that are able to be with patients, directly support with digital literacy and connectivity, and be a physical presence to further enhance the experience of the remote general practice
To reduce A&E admissions and improve the discharge process: use EWS to support the safe discharge of increasingly complex patients to optimise recuperation in at-home settings, have the digital skills and tools to monitor and report e.g. RESTORE2 for early intervention and re-admission avoidance, and be able to support reablement; the stepping stone to independence
Develop greener care:reducing mileage by minimising cross-overs between staff and building a wider multi-disciplinary team
The practical possibilities for this are supported by the further development of the Allied Health Professionals strategy. The publication of the Allied Health Professions’ Support Worker Competency, Education and Career Development Framework received support from Trades Unions, Professional Bodies and Trade Union partners. Whether it is development within roles or providing new career paths, new forms of offer and opportunities are going to be central in encouraging a post-Brexit, domestic workforce into the social care and health sector; along with producing the impact value of those roles and associated care interventions which enable commensurate levels of pay and reward.
Underpinning all endeavours and quality care and support are the 6Cs of Care. These emerged as part of ‘Compassion in Practice’ and were rolled out by NHS England to all staff in 2014 with subsequent promotion to the wider care sector by the national body Skills for Care.
“But what cannot happen is that domiciliary care continues to be overprescribed without receiving more support or being allowed to expand its offering”
The characteristics of commitment, care, compassion, competence, communication and courage are prevalent throughout our community care partners and their staff. With that commonality between the professions what might we do to deliver even more fulfilling roles: more people doing fulfilling roles, more fulfilment within the roles, more roles in addition to the present ones that are also fulfilling?
The alchemy that will bring this about is within the gift of every system in England and available to all domestic nations. It is the meaningful flourishing and delivery of an integrated care system (ICS). The ‘holy grail’ of ICS development is to provide timely, personalised care that maximises the independence of the individual receiving care which, naturally, points to a home-based solution. But what cannot happen is that domiciliary care continues to be overprescribed without receiving more support or being allowed to expand its offering.
This article seeks only to look at one small area of that; however, it is a vital area, being felt by the 957,000 people in the UK that receive domiciliary care and their families, along with the 822,000 staff looking after them (as recorded by RCN surveys). This, quite rightly, is now receiving both political support and national media attention.
The pandemic should be recognised as a catalyst for accelerated change, avoiding any sense of ‘once we’re through this we can get down to business as usual’. What has been done, and is being done in response to the pandemic, has demonstrated the creativity and pace of change possible as system partners have collaborated. Fostering and building on that is in itself both an opportunity and a challenge.
Across the sector there are understandable concerns of implementing radical service reform on an already exhausted and beleaguered workforce. But there are examples we can look to where workforce wellbeing is protected while simultaneously enhancing capacity and quality of care that motivates staff.
Some facts from one system
To service 800 clients in a 75-mile geographical perimeter, home care staff drive almost one million miles per annum. In work supported by the Health Foundation, it was found that at a (sub)urban travel speed averaging 20 mph, over 43,500 hours were being spent in vehicles; a substantial proportion of that could be put to new ways of working.
Work has shown that by reorganising the rounds, 5,220 hours of care could be released from the existing workforce. This would provide opportunities not only for more care to be delivered but importantly, and in respect of future retention and recruitment across the system, time for wellbeing, supervision, learning and development, accreditation of skills and assurance in their application. And with no extra hours of care being purchased.
In terms of application and the development of broader multi-disciplinary teams within ICSs, it was established that of the community nursing patients nearly 20 per cent were also social care clients. People were being visited by multiple staff in one day, requiring travel from multiple staff.
There are of course many activities and health interventions which can only be done by those with nursing and clinical qualifications. However, in approaching this issue with a mindset of curiosity, courage and compassion there are many interventions that could be performed in different ways.
For instance, one of the many activities that domiciliary care staff undertake is washing and creaming clients’ legs when there are wounds to be attended to. Nursing staff will then arrive to apply a bandage. While certain grades of wound clearly need nursing attention there are many at lower levels of severity that are capable of being attended to by a well-trained EWP – and of being checked on regularly, though less frequently, by the stretched community nursing complement.
Benefits of EWS for participants and for system development
Enhanced wellbeing practitioners:
Feel respected and able to develop their domiciliary care roles, feel even more a part of the system and that their contribution is valued. This could lead to enhanced profile and esteem. The additional activity means more time with the client and the opportunity to further enhance the relationship that exists
Opportunities will be presented to work in strengths-based ways and with programmes such as Making Every Contact Count, leading to enhanced wellbeing of the clients and a development of their connectivity and circle of support
This leads to improved job/role satisfaction – improved retention leading to increased recruitment. Developed circle of support for clients, enabling them to step up towards independence and reduce their reliance on statutory interventions. Release of capacity for those with assessed needs to have their needs met and begin their journey towards well-being
Community nurses
Feel an increased level of support with a bigger, more integrated, team available to them. They are then able to work with the more complex cases and make the very best use of their skills and knowledge while enabling and supporting other integrated team members to develop
Through enabling better management of case-loads, job satisfaction is increased and stress is reduced. As the RCN has established, with 75 per cent of community nurses reporting that they had left necessary activities undone, the professional dissonance of the role is alleviated, supporting staffwellbeing and retention
With the nursing and Allied Health Professional colleagues active in this way, early intervention and reductions in exacerbations of conditions lead to reduced admissions. With greater capacity, along with the skills to manage more complex discharges, hospital flow is improved
Benefits of EWS for health providers
Admissions through A&E:
Are reduced by earlier interventions and the ability to deploy the highly skilled staff in the community to support patients and reduce the deterioration in their condition
Improved flow through A&E with reduced admissions, enhancing the wellbeing of staff as well as the patients, and contributing to the enhanced application of funding to meet elective care
Discharges and re-admission rates:
Are further improved with the skills and capacity made available to support increasing numbers of and increasingly complex patients. With the integrated approach to working and early intervention opportunities, people are supported to remain at home, with their condition even better managed and do not require a re-admission to hospital
Skills and capacity across the community integrated team are available to support timely, safe discharge from hospital and discharge to assess and ensure people remain at home
The patient/client gets less ill and recovers more quickly being supported by a team that has the resources, capacity and skills to meet their needs. This increases the ability for them to remain well or recover quickly in their home setting, which include care homes and supported living
Increased numbers of people cared for closer to home with reduced exacerbations in conditions. Complex clinical requirements being met in community settings with both care-giver and the patient having a well developed strengths-based relationship throughout the care and support period, enabling a step up to independence
It is understandable that there will be anxieties associated with the shift in activities. In order to ascertain who delivers what and where to achieve the five aims of population health management (as illustrated below), the mantra to hold onto is right person, right care, right place, right time. Risk-managed prototyping using good design methodologies is key and implicit within the title on the tin of sustainability and transformation partnerships (the predecessor to ICSs).
There are many practical examples already available and still plenty of headroom for further development, which will accelerate the transformation in health and care models which are both sought for and needed.
Covid has shown us how much can be done in a short space of time; even with all the pressures in the system, GPs, acute trusts, AHSN and domiciliary care providers worked together to train 148 staff in the RESTORE2 methodology in just three months, with some going further to be trainers themselves.
Practical steps to developing and implementing enhanced wellbeing services
Train domiciliary care and care home staff to use the protocols and develop relationships with primary care practices
Ensure that training is accessible and that the nursing staff are corporately supported in the delegation of tasks
Look to see if care packages are allocated by geographically focussed provider or on first-come-first-served basis, and what the mileage component to the care rounds is for providers
Review the wounds being attended to in community settings and what best practice can offer in tackling the £5 billion cost of wound management
Consult on ways in which the Allied Health Professions’ Support Worker Competency, Education, and Career Development Framework can be optimised
Get the best facilitators and design thinkers, often found outside the system, to help ask the questions, listen and gather the answers and develop action-orientated plans with system partners – which includes the care unit, the patient/client and those caring for them
Whichever of the four policy drivers (politics, policy, money or measurements) one wishes to consider, they are captured within the Five Aims of Population Health Management; moving to EWS and development of the practitioners supports their delivery. Beyond this the one element that is maybe more implicit within the ‘petals’ below is capacity. EWS supports this explicitly.
Achieving more with less
In summary, below is the 30-second elevator review of how we can achieve more with less on the topic of domiciliary care.
More:
Time to care, more time to be more caring
Development and enrichment of roles
Person-centred care
Satisfaction with the role
Retention
Recruitment
Prevention and early intervention
Less:
Dissonance in the role and 6Cs
Siloed working
Variation in care team and discontinuity of care
Dissatisfaction with roles and system design
Turnover and leaving before retirement, or at the earliest opportunity
Vacancy and cost to trying to encourage people into services
Illness and cost
Addressing the care crisis
With the job-seeking public indicating that insufficient numbers of them wish to work in domiciliary care, now would be the time, supported by the policy of integrated care, to develop a new offer that enables truly integrated roles. This should seek to provide enhanced wellbeing services through an increasingly broad, multi-disciplinary, person-centred team.
To address this multifaceted care crisis, we should do more than seeking to invite people into traditional domiciliary care. The system might benefit from offering people a new role(s) that encompasses the domiciliary care that they are proud to already be doing, but also one that offers development, inclusion, satisfaction, esteem and commensurate compensation. This could become increasingly available if and when ICSs fulfil the potential that exists; one that reflects those stated aims within the recent white paper(s) and meets the five tenets of Population Health Management.
This should also note the observations of the CQC and their likely support to engage in discovery sessions for regulation alignment towards new ways of working. In doing so this should create a virtuous cycle towards a sustainable system, both financially and with capacity, through the delivery of integrated care.
John Bryant is Head of Strategy and Development for Torbay Council and an ICJ contributor. To contact John, become an ICJ contributor or to obtain a full reference list for this article, please write to news@integratedcarejournal.co.uk, and one of our Editors will assist.
PPP calls for adequate social care funding to end postcode lottery
By Integrated Care Journal
Public Policy Projects (PPP) has launched its first Social Care Network report, Mind the Cap: choices and consequences for financing social care, addressing the need for radical financial restructuring within the UK social care system.
The report, launched on 14 March, finds that the standard and financing of social care in the UK is subject to a postcode lottery. Given that social care is funded locally, there is vast regional inequality in the standard of care in the country.
Even with some level of means-tested support, and the newly introduced cap, the PPP Social Care Network found it a system unaffordable for many. The report concludes that these measures do not protect some low-middle income households from having to spend entire savings on social care.
PPP brought together 25 senior stakeholders and experts within the sector to discuss solutions to the crisis ahead of the spring budget. The report is sponsored by Radar Healthcare and the Royal Voluntary Service.
In September, parliament agreed to increase National Insurance Contributions by 1.25 per cent to establish a new ‘Health and Social Care Levy’ and introduced a new measure to cap care costs at £86,000. However, only a small proportion of money generated by the levy will go to social care, and the cap does not protect low-middle income individuals or families.
PPP’s social care network find that the Levy proposed by the government will not even begin to address the costs of care required by the system, and the cap protects those who are least likely to use the system.
Speaking at the report launch event, former Deputy Prime Minister Damian Green, said: “The current Health and Social Care Levy falls on the working age population, all of whom will be faced with inflationary cost of living pressures which we haven’t seen since the 1970s. It is falling on a particularly vulnerable portion of society.”
Key recommendations from the report include:
The government must focus its attention on how best to stimulate a wider insurance-based approach to care, encouraging individuals to participate in voluntary insurance schemes to cover costs up to the cap
The government should widen the scope of the Health and Social Care Levy; other forms of income and wealth for which National Insurance does not apply, such as rental income for private landlords, should also be considered for a social care levy
The government should explore greater flexibility around the Health and Social Care Levy, including the option of directing a proportion of the levy to an individual’s social care insurance scheme and/or contributions being made up by employers, as with pension schemes
The report emphasises that there is insufficient funding overall in the sector and that local authorities and care providers must be adequately funded for any improvement of the social care system. It also outlines that this funding should come from both private payment and higher state provision.
Mr Green said: “The adequate financing of social care is vital for the proper functioning of the system. Once we inject an appropriate amount of money into the system which has, quite frankly, been on its knees for years, we will begin to see the problems of the social care system begin to melt away. The measures proposed by the government are not sufficient, and more must be done to support those in need of care.”
Commenting on the report, Dame Esther Rantzen, Broadcaster and Founder of ChildLine and The Silver Line, said: “I know how crucial adequate funding is, both for those who offer care, and for those who receive it. The caring profession needs far better funding to give carers the opportunities and status they should have and enable them to give their work the time and skill it needs. And vulnerable people who need support should not have to worry whether they can afford the right care. Without proper funding carers will continue to be undervalued and their work unappreciated when in fact more and more people depend upon it.”
A new network to drive the integration agenda forward
By Chris Skidmore
Historical divisions between hospitals and family doctors, between physical and mental health, and between NHS and council services, have resulted in too many people experiencing disjointed care. All too often, it has been those from the most disadvantaged backgrounds and communities who have borne the brunt of disjointed care delivery, experiencing worse health outcomes than others.
Integrating both health and care has become a central mission both for the government and the NHS, with a clear focus on recently established integrated care systems (ICSs) as the driver of change.
Having been in development since 2018, July 2022 will see ICSs take up new statutory footing, providing a legal obligation to deliver joined up care and arrange services along a place-based approach. This will help ensure that decisions about how services are arranged should be made as closely as possible to those who use them. For most people their day-to-day health and care needs will be met locally in the town or district where they live or work. Partnership in these ‘places’ is therefore an important building block of integration, often in line with long-established local authority boundaries.
Yet the formal legal constitution of ICSs and their underlying new structures and governance, underpinned by integrated care boards (ICBs), can only be the start of a journey towards a fully realised vision of integrated care. With ICSs soon to be legally independent entities, the focus must now turn to their decision-making processes, and how they choose to adapt their services to meet local population needs.
Within this decision making will come the opportunity for more agile and rapid procurement processes, that allow for a more collaborative approach. Already the Department of Health has sought to support ICSs in their decisions, and has recently conducted a consultation on a new approach to arranging services – the Provider Selection Regime – which should make it easier to develop stable collaboration and to reduce some of the costs associated with the current procurement rules.
The government’s Integration White Paper: driving digital change in ICSs
Further to ICSs being established in law, the government’s Integration White Paper, published on 9 February 2022, goes further in ascribing a future strategic direction for ICSs and sets out a roadmap for better integration of services.
ICBs are expected to agree a plan for embedding population health management capabilities and ensuring these are supported by the necessary data and digital infrastructure, such as shared datasets and digital interventions. ICSs will use population health management (PHM) to help deliver personalised and predictive care based on an individual’s risk – which will be determined based upon an individual’s wider determinants of health.
Real-time insights from aggregated data will be crucial to achieving success in the fields of multi-disciplinary working, clinical decision support and waiting list management, at the same time as ensuring new diagnostic centres in the community can become a real success.
The Department of Health has also set out in the white paper an ‘ICS first’ approach, which will encourage organisations within an ICS to use the same digital systems, this will provide care teams with accurate and timely data, encouraging ease of information sharing. The department has set out a goal of 80 per cent adoption of digital social care records among CQC-registered social care providers by March 2024. To achieve this, ICSs must work with partners to drive adoption. Digital investment plans are expected to be finalised by June 2022, which include the steps being taken locally to support digital inclusion.
While more than 60 per cent of NHS trusts have made good progress into digitisation, with 21 per cent now digitally mature (as set out in the What Good Looks Like Framework), and only 10 per cent continuing to rely heavily on paper, the picture is often much more challenging in social care. Only 40 per cent of social care providers have electronic care records, and this is only improving slowly, at around three per cent per year. The Integration White Paper outlines a plan for adult social care that will ensure within six months of providers having an operational digital social care record in place, that staff are able to access and contribute to their local shared care record. Work is also underway to enable citizens to be able to amend their shared care records.
With these clear ambitions now set out in the Integration White Paper, there is a clear need to link policy ambition with the reality of enabling healthcare providers to deliver care within new ICS structures. As facilitators of joined up care delivery, ICSs will not be able to improve health outcomes without working closely with partners who share their vision of integration.
Integration can only be achieved by working alongside organisations with expertise in delivering patient management records and improved data collection methods – as well as with the pharmaceutical and health technology communities to deliver improved early-stage diagnostics and early access to treatments and therapies.
It is indeed these four areas of focus that represent the greatest opportunity both in the short and long term for ICSs to deliver real population health improvements in their local areas:
The future of healthcare data and the single patient record
The digital provision of healthcare
The improvement of diagnostics
The enhanced access to treatment and therapies
While the priorities for each ICS will rightly vary depending on the local patient needs and wider demographic demands, there is now a clear need to establish where common interests between ICSs exist, in order to enhance best practice. If ICSs are truly to become the benchmark of healthcare integration, then their own standards and performance will be monitored at a national level. It will therefore be incumbent for every ICS to engage fully in the wider policy debate about how they can deliver on the modernisation of healthcare through data, digital, treatments and technology. A wider forum is needed to help instruct ICSs on the right pathways to take for the future.
Public Policy Projects (PPP) has, for 25 years, been at the forefront of the healthcare policy debate; as an independent policy institute chaired by former Health Secretary Rt Hon Stephen Dorrell, it is recognised as a leading policy organisation that works with thought leaders across both health and social care, pharmaceuticals and more recently genomics. PPP has made the policy framework around the provision of integrated services a central mission of its work, and is responsible for publication of the Integrated Care Jounral.
ICJ brings together leaders in health, social care, local government, policy and research to engage with the latest insights and analysis surrounding the future of health and social care in the UK. Content is produced by and for the very leaders tasked with delivering joined up care across the country – covering every facet of ICS development.
To spearhead its outcomes-based approach to content, ICJ has recently established an Editorial Advisory Board. The board oversees content production pipeline, ensuring that our articles are insightful, practical and credible. The board is made up of some the country’s leading health and care experts and features system leaders at the very forefront of UK integrated care.
As part of its policy work for 2022, PPP is now seeking to establish a new Integrated Care Network which, alongside Integrated Care Jounral, will help provide ICS leaders with the policy guidance and support to make the best decisions for achieving improved patient health outcomes. PPP has already hosted a number of ICS related events, including a recent roundtable alongside IQVIA.
The start of this new Integrated Care Network work will begin with an ‘Integrated Futures’ roundtable series, beginning this Spring 2022, to mark the formal adoption of ICSs into law.
As part of the ‘Integrated Futures’ series, PPP will organise four roundtables focusing on the core areas of partnership between ICSs and healthcare providers which can deliver the greatest impact and benefit:
The future of healthcare data and the single patient record
The digital provision of healthcare
The improvement of diagnostics
The enhanced access to treatment and therapies
These roundtables will bring together both ICS representatives and leaders, together with healthcare partners at the forefront of working with ICSs to deliver on better care through innovation and improved access to data, digital technologies and enhanced treatments and therapies.
The Integrated Futures series will seek to position PPP as the forum for the high quality exchange of ideas and future policy, with those ideas intended to influence both NHS strategy and ICS leaders. As such, this will be an important forum for companies and organisations to be involved in, at a time when the future direction of ICSs both at a local and national level is still to be fully established.
To achieve the NHS Long Term Plan goal of preventing health inequalities and improving health outcomes, the voices of those delivering and receiving dental care on a local level must be prioritised.
Top-down change, if not informed by local experience, will fail to address issues faced by service users and service providers. Therefore, the voice and experience of local councils, local Healthwatch and local service providers is key to creating an environment through which NHS dentistry can play its part in reducing health inequalities and improving health outcomes. This is why building strong relationships with these bodies is central to the role played by Local Dental Committees (LCCs).
The LDC Confederation is a membership body for LDCs which represent primary care dentists delivering care under an NHS contract. We actively support our member LDCs to engage with local stakeholders, to take the time to explain the complex NHS dental contract and to make clear how, if properly supported, NHS dentistry could help meet their local objectives. These local relationships have created sympathetic alliances and a strong desire at the local level to see a reformed dental contract introduced that would remove barriers to care, which in turn would help to reduce health inequalities and improve health outcomes.
The local councils and local Healthwatch know their populations, understand their issues and seek to identify areas for improvement. Even before the pandemic, we were pleased to see a growing interest in NHS dental services from local stakeholders. Since then, of course, we have seen access to NHS dental services and appropriate provision of NHS dental care grow into a burning issue for almost every local authority.
Member LDCs have enjoyed close working with their local Healthwatch partners, helping with reports and speaking at events throughout London. During the pandemic we provided updates and patient facing information for our local partners to help them and their communities to navigate NHS dental services. This interest has increased dramatically throughout the pandemic as services have struggled to meet patient demand.
Barriers to access
The barriers to access exacerbated by the pandemic have existed since 2006. The pandemic simply brought them to the fore and demonstrated the historic neglect that NHS dentistry has suffered, but also the huge importance that the public place on NHS dentistry. Time and again we have seen reports which show clearly that dental services are highly valued and that satisfaction with the quality and outcome of the care received is high.
NHS dentistry should be one of the great success stories within the wider NHS: a high achieving clinical specialty, with high patient satisfaction, providing clinical care able to give instant pain relief and rapid functional outcomes. Instead, sadly, it is treated as an ancillary service which is not vital to health and wellbeing.
Local stakeholders know differently. They hear stories from patients in pain on a regular basis, from parents of children in pain, from those who are ashamed to go out or eat in public, from people who are afraid to access care because of the NHS charges and those who simply cannot navigate the system and end up at the GP or in A&E. We have been working hard with local partners to press for improvements to holistic care, especially for the most vulnerable such as those in residential care homes and those with conditions such as Alzheimer’s and other dementias, diabetes and stroke rehabilitation. These groups in particular need the system to work with them and for them if they are to lead lives free from avoidable pain and discomfort. Integration of services at the local level will support a holistic approach to care which would pay dividends in improved general health outcomes and quality of life.
Dental contract pilots
Dental contract pilots, later termed prototypes, have been the great hope of the profession since they began in 2010. These pilots were testing new models for the contracting of NHS dental care and were based on blends of capitation and activity. Appointments were longer and the focus was on prevention.
90 per cent of patients had reduced or maintained levels of tooth decay
80 per cent of patients had reduced or maintained levels of gum disease
97 per cent of patients said they were satisfied with the dental care they received
At the start of 2022 the NHS announced the end of the prototypes and all dental practices operating as prototypes for the NHS are now reverting to their previous contracts. Despite the models showing such promise it is not clear how much of the valuable information taken from these pilots will be applied to a reformed contract in the future.
Local voices are vital
The current Units of Dental Activity (UDA) contract, is based on activity and the NHS is heavily reliant on recouping funding for dentistry through patient charges. This creates a disincentive for the system to increase access among those with the highest need, as a greater number of treatments take longer and in doing so will reduce the amount of activity delivered, throughput of patients and the amount of funding the NHS can recoup from patient charges. The current activity based contract is not able to support local objectives of reducing health inequalities, and the focus on treatment rather than prevention does not support the local objective of improving health outcomes.
If the local councils, and in the future local care partnerships and Integrated Care Boards, want to see a reduction in health inequalities and improvement in health outcomes then a dental contract which supports those objectives is needed. The LDC Confederation ensures that local stakeholders understand NHS dental services and the role they can play in meeting these priorities. We will continue to work with our local partners to make sure local voices who know their populations best will be heard at the national level. Local voices are vital to inform dental contract reform and to make sure that the dental contract is fit for purpose.
The Minister for Primary Care, Maria Caulfield, recently outlined the aforementioned problems with the dental contract on BBC Radio Sussex, and also affirmed the importance of contract reform. Both of these statements are to be welcomed but real improvements will only be seen if that reform is based on the experiences and priorities of those delivering and receiving care at the local level.
Is the answer to improved health hiding in plain sight?
By Dr Anne Elliott and Professor Tim Evans
The UK is suffering from a major gap in the provision for exercise as a prevention or management tool for chronic disease. Outlining this growing healthcare crisis is Dr Anne Eliott, Senior Lecturer in Physical Activity for Special Populations and Healthy Ageing, and Prof Tim Evans, Professor in Business and Political Economy at Middlesex University London.
Over and above record NHS waiting lists1 and the adverse effects of the Covid pandemic, there is a tsunami of chronic disease on the horizon, and it is flowing towards us at a stately and predictable rate2. We can see the wave growing and developing, we can gauge its potential cost, we can foresee the amount and quality of resources that will be needed, and we can estimate the number of specialist healthcare professionals that will be required to address it – and yet we seem unable to avert what increasingly appears to be an inevitable disaster.
We cannot lay the blame for the growth in long-term illness on a lack of health education, as positive health messaging from both the state and private sectors is prevalent in all popular media and easily accessible for all age groups and populations. At the bare minimum, the general public understands the importance of ‘eat less’ and ‘move more’. Over the last 20 years, successive governments have sponsored numerous initiatives that have attempted to address such issues, from Change4Life (PHE 2009) that aimed to encourage families to exercise together, to the recent adoption of an old idea, social prescribing3 (NHS 2020), that targets loneliness and depression at a local community level.
However, differing socio-economic determinants have been identified as obstacles to participation. Although authorities try to address these barriers, sedentary behaviours and lifestyles are responsible for 40 per cent of premature mortalities and continue to be the weak spot for ‘preventative medicine’4, a term now well established within Parliament and across the UK’s broader political discourse.
Cost is consistently found to be one of the biggest barriers to moving towards a healthier lifestyle. Through physical activity in the private sector and with levels of economic status found to be correlated to health outcomes5, it would be beneficial to make access to exercise easy as both a preventative tool in the public sector and as a response to the onset of many diseases further adversely impacting the medical sector.
A gap in provision
There is a clear gap in provision for exercise as a prevention or management tool for chronic disease and there isn’t availability or knowledge in the existing medical workforce to bridge it
At present, general practitioners are the most efficient and effective pathway to intervention and support for people in local communities. However, there are limited options, such as exercise referral schemes6, found to be too short for exercise adherence and too expensive for most practices to utilise, or referral to a scheme such as the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme. Apart from these ‘schemes’ the next level of physical specialism is physiotherapy and associated disciplines which are geared to address more clinically acute rehabilitative issues.
It is against this backdrop that there is a clear gap in provision for exercise as a prevention or management tool for chronic disease and there isn’t availability or knowledge in the existing medical workforce to bridge it. However, with some creative change and investment, the workforce required to fill this gap could be closer at hand than most commentators realise.
Currently, there are approximately 66,300 fitness instructors in the UK, of which 22,032 are personal trainers. They are well placed to work with the general public with diagnosed or undiagnosed chronic conditions – it is common for sufferers to live with low level conditions for up to 20 years before they seek help from their doctor, when the condition interferes with their quality of life. The Chartered Institute for the Management of Sport and Physical Activity (CIMPSA), acknowledges this specialist need and has drawn up professional standards for fitness7. Ukactive8 also discussed using trainers more within a wider community based social prescribing framework. We see professional bodies turning their consideration to this in light of Covid, which has created an awakening of understanding for the need to improve the physical and mental health of an ailing population.
Upskilling the workforce
While such upskilling requires investment, the costs will not be as great as leaving health outcomes to an unnecessarily disjointed and unreformed skills base
The fitness workforce has historically been eschewed by the medical profession on the basis that too many of its practitioners lack appropriate levels of educational attainment. Personal trainers are shown to have qualifications that range from a ‘two-week online course’ to a Masters degree in a sport specialisation such as Strength and Conditioning. Industry regulation has mitigated this to a certain extent by registering most practitioners with a vocational qualification equivalent to an A level. However, these fitness qualifications are not mapped to any NHS accreditation and qualification requirements and so a divide between health provisions runs deep.
An obvious solution to this division is to bring existing fitness qualifications into parity with the medical regulatory framework. The workforce can be upskilled into the range of existing NHS levels of qualifications and pathways, such as apprenticeships, which may then provide an opportunity to create roles acknowledged by the Health and Care Professions Council.
While such upskilling requires investment, the costs will not be as great as leaving health outcomes to an unnecessarily disjointed and unreformed skills base. At a time when the NHS is facing its largest ever backlog, it would be wholly inappropriate to invent a new category of worker, train them from scratch, or alternatively do absolutely nothing.
Workforce planning
While in the past the pressures of electoral politics have often prohibited effective workforce planning, inaction with regards to the country’s fitness workforce is contributing to a multifacted healthcare crisis
To mitigate the ill effects of both the waiting list backlog and the coming tsunami of chronic disease outcomes, it is important to make key investment and workforce planning decisions now. These plans should ideally be locked into our health system for the longer term through a robust cross-party agreement.
For decades, successive British governments of all stripes have avoided workforce planning issues. Incentivised by shorter-term electoral cycles, they have instead left the healthcare system dangerously exposed to the fragilities of professional overstretch. This is why the UK has so few doctors and nurses in comparison to other comparable countries in the developed world9.
However, with today’s spiralling costs, waiting lists setting ever higher records and more than 21 per cent of people now opting to use private healthcare10, the NHS urgently needs creative solutions if it is going to have space to develop and implement better planning.
It is in this context that this proposal to upskill and realign existing professional skills and resources makes so much sense. As a swift and effective solution to overcome a current and costly chasm in our health system, the objective has to be not only holding back the looming wave of chronic disease but to enact comparatively inexpensive reform that will mitigate its most damaging and costly effects.
Faced with an unprecedented and systemic crisis of demand, the time for imaginative supply side reform is now more pressing than ever. If several tens of thousands of people are not empowered to fill the gap in our health economy, then the NHS – and the electoral support that it has hitherto enjoyed – could become irreparably damaged. While in the past the pressures of electoral politics have often prohibited effective workforce planning, inaction with regards to the country’s fitness workforce is contributing to a multifacted healthcare crisis.
Mind the Cap: choices & consequences for financing social care
By Francesco Tamilia
The government has announced its plans for social care reforms – but do they go far enough to address the issues endemic to social care?
Reforming social care – particularly with regards to financing it – has been a major challenge for successive governments over the past decades. Despite widespread acknowledgment of the need to reform the system, it remains in flux. In 2019, Prime Minister Boris Johnson pledged in his maiden speech that he was going to “fix social care”. Following the Covid-19 pandemic, the government has put forward clear proposals for reform – including addressing financing issues by increasing National Insurance contributions by 1.25 per cent to establish a new ‘Health and Social Care Levy’.
To discuss the financing challenges in social care, Public Policy Projects (PPP) hosted a roundtable with senior stakeholders in the sector as part of its “The Future of Social Care” report series in January 2022.
Lack of funding a chronic issue
The new social care reforms were broadly welcomed by participants, although many also expressed concern that the reforms do not go far enough to comprehensively address the depth of the issues in the sector.
“We simply don’t spend enough money on it.”
Lack of funding was, by far, the most recurrent theme of the discussion, with one attendee citing lack of adequate funding as the root cause of current market distortions in the first place.
He argued that “we simply don’t spend enough money on it. Every year, the Budget comes around, and when the social care system continues to be completely on its knees, the Treasury simply adds an extra billion pounds. This is immature. If we have to put an extra billion pounds into social care every year, then let’s say ‘over the next five years, we are going to put an extra billion pounds every year into social care’ so that care providers can plan. And then we don’t have the ludicrous chaos that we have at the moment, there is a barrier to planning there. We have to spend more on social care – and this is not just about older people, it’s about working-age adults as well.”
Where’s the money?
Speaking on the same issue, another attendee referenced historical funding in the care sector and highlighted how insufficient funding has led to an unsustainable market. He illustrated how social care expenditure over the last decade has increased since 2015-16, peaking at record levels in 2021 – largely due to the extra money that went into the system due to Covid-19. Roughly half of spending is on working-age adults and the other half is on older people. Money is indeed coming into the sector, but the question is: where exactly has the money been spent, and is it anywhere close to what is needed?
“The money coming into the system has not been spent on improving access and bringing more people into the system/”
Addressing the first question, the same attendee said, “the money coming into the system has not been spent on improving access and bringing more people into the system.” Consequently, eligibility for care has continued to tighten and has not risen in line with inflation, thereby excluding more people from the publicly funded system.
If that money hasn’t gone on improving access for more people, where has it gone? The answer seems to be on the average fees that local authorities pay for care homes. Indeed, there has been, in real terms, a 4 per cent increase in what local authorities pay for working-age adults and a 17 per cent increase in what they pay for older people’s care. “I don’t think you could argue that the extra money has gone on improvements in quality. Quality measures have stayed static over this period and Care Quality Commission (CQC) ratings have nudged up. Satisfaction ratings of publicly funded clients have also stayed pretty much the same. It seems much more likely that [the extra money] is going to fund home care and care home fees,” the same participant added.
Risk pooling a welcome step
“The private sector will never provide pooling of this catastrophic risk.”
A move by the government that was particularly welcomed by attendees was the notion of risk pooling social insurance. Rather than facing a potentially very uncertain risk profile, everybody effectively pays the same amount and is then covered against those risks. “That is undoubtedly what we should do.” said one attendee. “Social care is the only big risk that we all face where neither the state nor the private sector provides risk pooling. The private sector will never provide pooling of this catastrophic risk, it must be done by the state.” According to him, taking away the catastrophic risks gives us a chance of getting a market that will work not just for individuals, but for providers as well.
Overall, there was widespread agreement that although the new proposed legislation is a step in the right direction, more needs to be done to properly address the chronic financing issues in the sector. Yet, it’s equally important that any money that comes into the system is allocated wisely. Achieve this, and the many other issues in the care sector such as workforce and market fragility, can then be addressed.
This write-up forms one part of the wider Public Policy Projects Social Care Policy Programme. Drawing together key stakeholders from across the private sector, PPP intends to lead the debate on social care reform, to scrutinise and discuss the Government’s plans as they are delivered. Led by the Rt Hon Damien Green, the network continues to convene regularly for high-level strategic roundtable discussions in order to gather intelligence, insight and experience to deliver its recommendations through the publication of four reports.
1. Integrating Health & Social Care: A National Care Service
2. Mind the Cap: choices & consequences for financing social care
3. The Social Care Workforce: Averting a Crisis
4. A Care System for the Future: Digital Opportunities and the Arrival of Caretech
If you are interested in learning more about this significant programme of work, get involved in our work and partner with Public Policy Projects, please reach out to carl.hogkinson@publicpolicyprojects.com
Experts call for ICSs to embrace industry and harness the “patient voice” to drive innovation
By David Duffy
During a crucial period for UK health and care policy reform, Public Policy Projects and IQVIA convened over 500 healthcare stakeholders for a special online discussion to identify the challenges and opportunities for UK life sciences within a new future of integrated care.
The topic was more than timely. Only hours prior to the event, the government published its eagerly anticipated Integration white paper, seeking to clarify exactly how integrated care will improve the patient experience and bring better value to the taxpayer. The white paper follows the publication of the Elective Care Recovery Plan published on Tuesday, which sets out the NHS plan for bringing down the elective care backlog and addressing the longstanding issue of waiting times, both of which have been exacerbated following Covid-19.
In the context of these flagship health policy proposals from government, this session was quickly brought into sharp political focus. “What we need to do through integrated care systems (ICSs) is learn lessons of recent history and apply them to develop more joined up integrated care – this is as important for UK life sciences as it is for health providers,” reflected PPP Executive Chair, Stephen Dorrell.
While this end goal has never been in question, the exact role of ICSs, and by extension ICS leadership, in delivering this joined approach has often been subject to debate. Dr Penny Dash, Chair of NW London ICS and Co-Chair of the Cambridge Health Network, likened the role of an ICS to one of the key facilitator of joined up care rather than a direct provider of it. “While we [ICS leadership] have control over funding, we do not have direct control over the health service provider portfolio, nor do we have commissioning control and we cannot simply move contracts around the system,” she said. The key benefit of ICS frameworks, she insisted, was to convene key parts of the system and build a robust population health strategy.
“We are rapidly moving towards borough-based partnerships (accounting for some 300,000 people in a locality). We want to see those services delivered much more at scale, with much better ability to coordinate and deliver a population health approach.”
Matthias Winker, Head of Strategy at Oxfordshire and Berkshire West ICS, also stressed the importance of ICSs acting as conveners of care transformation. “Our function as a facilitator is crucial, we are introducing a ‘learning culture’ by bringing different capabilities from different organisations to the table. This is particularly relevant when discussing commissioning skills, provider capabilities and local authority expertise.”
A new model of coordinating care also signals profound changes to the relationship between pharmacy and the wider healthcare sector. Brian Smith, Chief Pharmacist, Applied Insights, Access & Value, UK at IQVIA, stressed that ICSs have the potential to alter focus from measuring inputs to focusing on outputs. “Community pharmacists, for example, are remunerated on the number of prescriptions they dispense rather the value they provide – this dynamic has to change to bring community pharmacy further into system wide healthcare provision.”
Life sciences: “Seizing the opportunity”
Industry should be and will be round the same table as colleagues in the ICS landscape – playing an important part in delivering innovation
The agenda to join up health and care service provision wherever possible runs parallel to developing the UK into a life science powerhouse. ICS frameworks present new opportunities to enhance access to care, develop transparency and choice, and ensure that innovative treatments reach the people who need them – the patients.
Also speaking was Dr Ben Bridgewater, a former Professor of Cardiac Surgery at South Manchester NHS and now CEO of Health Innovation Manchester – an academic health science and innovation system, at the forefront of transforming the health and wellbeing of Greater Manchester’s 2.8 million citizens.
Reflecting on the opportunities for advancing health and care innovation, Dr Bridgewater said, “There is an extraordinary and exciting opportunity in ICS development to build momentum for those innovations and exciting projects and move as quickly as we can from the same old statutory functions. We must seize the opportunity.”
Building on this positive tone was Russell Abberley, General Manager, UK & Ireland for Amgen and Chair of the American Pharmaceutical Group (APG). Insisting that the pint glass was “half full” when it comes to UK life sciences innovation, Mr Abberley outlined his excitement over the prospect of industry, “building a stronger partnership” with the health and care sectors. “Industry should be and will be round the same table as colleagues in the ICS landscape – playing an important part in delivering innovation and data to solve issues around workforce and diagnostics and moving patients through the systems.
“I think we [industry] can play a really important part in communicating the value proposition of the solutions: the data, the technology, the medicines, the diagnostics, whether it be to solve some of the challenges around workforce and diagnostics and moving patients out into primary care or out back into the community.”
Mr Abberley went on to stress that the longer-term challenges are around health inequalities, driving uptake and access to treatments, as well as delivering treatments for patients in locality.
The voice of the patient
It is not about having the patient directly in the room, it’s about ensuring the system represents their voice
An increasingly important part of the integrated care debate has been the concept of building care around the patient – putting the patient in control of their own care and ensuring the system works for them. These themes were affirmed in the recent Integration White Paper, which placed particular emphasis on the value of “personalised medicine”. However, if providers truly want to develop personalised medicine, then they will need to take opportunities to better understand the people receiving it.
The extent to which patients should be included as an active participant in system transformation has proven to be a challenging and interesting debate and speakers on the day did not shy away from this discussion. Dr Bridgewater pointed to the inclusion of the voluntary sector as an important and necessary step to securing the patient voice in system transformation.
While certainly conscious of the fact that the people sitting at an ICB meeting may not be best placed to help patients understand how to live a healthier life, Dr Penny Dash played down the idea of direct patient involvement in transformation processes. She argued that if providers consider the idea of the patient ‘voice’ too literally, it could end up encompassing an entire ICS population (in Ms Dash’s case that would include the 2.2 million residents of NW London ICS).
“It is not about having the patient directly in the room, it’s about ensuring the system represents their voice, understands their needs and challenges and [about] tackling population health and…addressing health inequalities.”
Addressing health inequality is as important for life sciences as it is wider health and care – treatments and innovations brought into the ecosystem must not inadvertently exacerbate disparities through unequal access. As Dr Dash explained, “ensuring equitable service uptake while addressing the perennial issues of obesity and smoking is the priority; this is a huge and complicated agenda but we can no longer have an environment where sections of the population are ‘hard to reach.’”
Dr Bridgewater argued that what is considered the concept of a patient ‘voice’ in healthcare might be referred to as ‘customer centricity’ in other sectors. “Software companies understand the importance of user-centric design, but this concept has not always fed through to healthcare. Achieving this will require some co-creation with people who have lived experience of this issue – as well as ensuring collaboration with industry colleagues.”
Delivering innovation
If you do not open yourself up to power of industry you are missing a trick
Industry has a huge role to play in guiding system transformation. Ahead of ICSs taking up statutory footing in July, this webinar was a timely opportunity to dissect the debate and ensure that industry has a ‘seat at the table’.
“There must be incentivisation for both sides of the equation,” said Mr Matthias Winker, “commercial innovation has yet to truly mature for ICSs, however this could rapidly develop over the next few years – but we are still a long way off from where the life sciences sector is in terms of utilising commercial opportunities to encourage innovation adoption.”
Where pharma was once considered the ‘dark side’, there is now acknowledgement that its capacity for harnessing innovation presents a powerful opportunity to deliver lifesaving treatments to patients. Evidence in recent years of this shift in mindset can be seen with the Cancer Drugs Fund, presenting a faster means of appraising new drugs and treatments – harnessing industry innovation earlier. The ICS framework presents a unique opportunity to expand such opportunities.
“If you do not open yourself up to power of industry you are missing a trick,” said Dr Bridgewater who outlined the importance of the concept of ‘agency’ in encouraging innovation adoption. This concept has allowed Health Innovation Manchester to shift the dynamic in favour of innovation, allowing organisations to craft relationships and drive technology within the ICS structures.
Life science innovation in an ICS future
Whatever happens over the next few years, the whole system must be engaged in this transformation process
“While specific roles and duties of ICS leadership will change over time, it should become, and remain, the place where strategy is developed before handing to local providers for delivery,” said Dr Dash, “and developing strategic visions for innovation, as well as measuring and assessing its impact, is absolutely the role of the ICS.”
What most refer to as a care pathway, some in other sectors would consider an ‘innovation supply chain’, and this mindset should help turn the dial in favour of quicker innovation adoption. Ensuring this supply chain works requires making priority calls about what to do next, managing the benefit of innovation against the complexity of implementing it across the system.
Whatever happens over the next few years, the whole system must be engaged in this transformation process. As Mr Dorrell concluded, “this process cannot simply be about which compound to use specifically while the rest of the system remains unchanged. Why even bother innovating if it is used in an unchanged health system?”
Evident from the outset of this webinar was that the principle of integration must extend far beyond linking service providers. ICSs have a special responsibility to ensure that the health and care ecosystem includes industry partners, harnessing their innovative potential while ensuring the ‘voice’ of the patient is a key consideration in the transformation process.
