{"id":5141,"date":"2024-02-05T16:29:10","date_gmt":"2024-02-05T16:29:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/?p=5141"},"modified":"2024-03-07T11:28:39","modified_gmt":"2024-03-07T11:28:39","slug":"bma-survey-finds-widespread-concern-among-doctors-role-pas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/bma-survey-finds-widespread-concern-among-doctors-role-pas\/","title":{"rendered":"BMA survey finds widespread concern among doctors over role of physician associates"},"content":{"rendered":"
A majority of doctors have expressed concern that physician associates (PAs) and anaesthesia associates (AAs) are undertaking tasks beyond their competence, according to a new survey from the BMA.<\/p>\n
In the survey of more than 19,000 doctors, nearly 80 per cent reported concerns that MAPs were \u201coccasionally or frequently\u201d working on tasks for which they are underqualified, with 87 per cent believing that the current rules pose a risk to patient safety, some or all of the time.<\/p>\n
A majority of doctors also believe that working with PAs and AAs has increased their workloads, according to the survey. Only 21 per cent of respondents reported a decrease in their workloads since the employment of MAPs, while more 55 per cent reported that their workload had instead increased.<\/p>\n
Professor Phil Banfield, BMA Chair of Council, said: \u201cNHS England tells us that \u2018Physician Associates support doctors in the diagnosis and management of patients,\u2019 supposedly giving doctors more time to deliver the high-quality care only they can give.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut the reality appears to be the exact opposite \u2013 too many doctors are telling us that working with PAs is instead draining their time and energy. The responsibility for signing off prescriptions and ensuring the PAs are working within their proper scope of practice quite rightly falls on the supervising doctor, but also those doctors working alongside them; as scope has inappropriately crept ever further it has made far more work for doctors than it has saved.<\/p>\n
86 per cent of doctors also reported concern that the role of MAPs, and the difference between MAPs and fully qualified doctors, is not well understood by the public, and that many patients may wrongly assume they are being seen by a fully trained doctor. 80 per cent said they would support the change of terminology from Associates to \u2018Assistants\u2019, as they were known until 2013.<\/p>\n
The House of Lords is expected to consider this week the Anaesthesia Associates and Physician Associates Order 2024 statutory instrument, which if passed, will see the GMC appointed as regulator of MAPs. 72 per cent of respondents to the BMA survey expressed their opposition to the move. The BMA itself has called for all legislators to oppose the Order, arguing instead that regulation of MAPs should fall to the Health Care and Professions Council.<\/p>\n
Liberal Democrat Peer, Baroness Sal Brinton, has tabled a motion of regret outlining concerns about the regulation of MAPs falling under the remit of the GMC, as well as about the nomenclature applied to MAPs, which the motion states \u201crisks confusion for patients\u201d.<\/p>\n
Professor Phil Banfield added: \u201cThe House of Lords will soon have a chance to oppose damaging legislation that aids that blurring of lines by regulating PAs under the GMC, the doctors\u2019 regulator rather than the more appropriate Health and Care Professions Council.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Government and NHSE should be instead ensuring that PAs return to their original purpose of supporting, not replacing doctors, so that doctors can get on with utilising the diagnostic and treatment skills they have spent so long at medical school gaining their expertise in.\u202f Their scope should be strictly defined and, to ensure patients are not confused, the title returned to the more accurate \u201cphysician assistant\u201d \u2013 then they can play their valuable role in supporting the delivery of NHS care safely.\u201d<\/p>\n
The BMA has made the following recommendations:<\/p>\n
The BMA calls for immediate pause to recruitment into Medical Associate Professional (MAP) roles and to limit the scope of MAP roles to administrative and low-risk clinical tasks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":5142,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[25,36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","category-workforce"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5141"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5141\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5146,"href":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5141\/revisions\/5146"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5142"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}