{"id":4804,"date":"2023-09-18T11:04:47","date_gmt":"2023-09-18T11:04:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/?p=4804"},"modified":"2023-10-06T14:12:33","modified_gmt":"2023-10-06T14:12:33","slug":"urgent-action-prevent-retirement-disability-timebomb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/urgent-action-prevent-retirement-disability-timebomb\/","title":{"rendered":"Urgent action needed to prevent retirement disability benefit ‘timebomb’ – report"},"content":{"rendered":"

A significant increase in the number of people spending a decade or more of their retirement on disability benefits is expected unless urgent preventative action is taken, according to new research from consultancy firm LCP.<\/p>\n

Although much of the public discussion around \u2018economic inactivity\u2019 focuses on those of working age in receipt of benefits for those unfit to work, these benefits stop at pension age, when individuals switch to a state retirement pension. By contrast, disability benefits such as Personal Independence Payments (PIP) continue to be paid throughout retirement for those already eligible when they retire. The new analysis suggests that unless action is taken to improve the health of these individuals, the cost of funding these benefits will rise significantly in the coming years.<\/p>\n

The research<\/a> finds that just under 100,000 people aged 66 (the state retirement age) are currently in receipt of PIP or its predecessor, Disability Living Allowance (DLA), and are expected to draw these benefits for another 11 years, on average. It estimates that of those individuals, half will continue claiming PIP until they die. The total payment per person would be around \u00a370,000, but this could rise for individuals on low incomes and those claiming means-tested benefits.<\/p>\n

Without mitigation, the total number of pensioners on PIP\/DLA is likely to rise by around 60 per cent in the next decade, from approximately 1 million now to 1.6 million in 2023, LCP\u2019s research suggests. The total cost of funding these benefits would rise from around \u00a36bn to \u00a310.5bn.The total current cost of PIP in 2023\/24 is \u00a321.8 billion, and the benefit is paid to 3.2m people.<\/p>\n

The number of adults in receipt of PIP (plus DLA) has risen by around 1 million in the last decade and is forecast by DWP to rise by another million in the next three years. For younger PIP recipients, the fastest growing reported health condition is mental health problems, whereas, for older claimants, it is more likely to be musculoskeletal complaints. The fastest growing group of recipients is those who have been in receipt for five years or more, suggesting a risk of a large and growing \u2018core\u2019 of recipients with a dwindling prospect of flowing off benefit at all.<\/p>\n

Looking at all PIP\/DLA recipients aged 16 or over, receipt of benefits is heavily concentrated in more deprived areas. The table (below) shows the 10 parliamentary constituencies with the highest absolute numbers of PIP\/DLA recipients as of 2023, and how the number has changed in the last decade. Five of the top six are in the Merseyside area, and all have seen a growth in numbers of between 20-30 per cent in the last decade.<\/p>\n

If targeted action is not taken, many of the working age claimants in these areas will reach pension age on disability benefits and then be more likely to die in receipt than cease claiming.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Table: Westminster constituencies with largest numbers of 16+ recipients of PIP \/ DLA in 2023 (England and Wales only). Source: DWP \u2018Stat Xplore\u2019 database. Click to enlarge.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The higher levels of benefit receipt in more deprived areas suggest the potential for targeted health interventions, which could reduce the number of people who need to claim in the first place and\/or reduce the length of claim for those who do receive benefits. However, the authors argue that past government interventions have proven insufficiently focused on those most in need.<\/p>\n

The research cites as an example the DWP\u2019s recent expansion of the \u201cIndividual Placement and Support in Primary Care Programme\u201d (IPSPC), which was designed to support individuals in receipt of disability benefits. However, the list of local authorities chosen to date excludes those where disability benefit receipt is at its highest.<\/p>\n

Another example is NHS England\u2019s \u2018Elective Recovery Programme\u2019, which aims to increase capacity to tackle the waiting list backlog that significantly worsened during the Covid-19 pandemic. This programme has not specifically prioritised areas of greatest unmet health need, according to the researchers.<\/p>\n

The paper argues that with each person who reaches pension age on PIP likely to receive another \u00a370,000 in benefit on average, there is great potential for cost-effective interventions which would benefit the individuals concerned as well as the taxpayer. For example:<\/p>\n