{"id":4473,"date":"2023-05-05T09:45:24","date_gmt":"2023-05-05T09:45:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/?p=4473"},"modified":"2023-06-01T15:23:24","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T15:23:24","slug":"dire-state-social-care-undermined-pandemic-response","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/dire-state-social-care-undermined-pandemic-response\/","title":{"rendered":"Dire state of social care sector undermined pandemic response, study finds"},"content":{"rendered":"

Lack of visibility of the sector, unclear accountability, insecure funding and poor workforce pay and conditions impacted the sector\u2019s ability to implement protective measures in a timely way, according to a new report<\/a> published by the Nuffield Trust.<\/p>\n

The report is the result of a two-year joint study between the Nuffield Trust and the London School of Economics, and looks at issues which emerged with the Covid-19 response in the social care sector in England. Focusing on the initial four months of the pandemic response (February-May 2020), it found that the fragmented nature of the system and a shortage of civil servants working on social care contributed to confusion over who was responsible for decisions and implementation in the Covid response, which, for example, undermined the effective distribution of PPE and testing for care staff.<\/p>\n

The study also concluded that successive governments failed to respond to concerns surrounding pandemic-preparedness identified by multiple cross-government planning exercises. Amid a poor understanding of the sector and its capabilities within government, many smaller care providers were unable to effectively accommodate infection control measures and adhere to the slew of ever-changing guidance and regulation, with disastrous consequences for the nearly 20,000 care home residents who died in England and Wales in spring 2020.<\/p>\n

Natasha Curry, Deputy Director of Policy at the Nuffield Trust, commented: \u201cWhat happened to social care at the start of the pandemic represents the consequences of letting one of our most important public services languish in constant crisis for years. Those early months exposed an array of weaknesses within social care that impacted the shape, speed and effectiveness of the response. Many of these difficult challenges could have been eased had warnings been heeded. Governments of all hues have failed to make social care and those who need it a priority.”<\/p>\n

Drawing on interviews with sector experts, workshops with social care stakeholders (including people who use care), policy documents, and literature, the report identified areas that could put social care on a more resilient footing in the future.<\/p>\n

The report found:<\/p>\n