{"id":3059,"date":"2022-05-26T10:58:45","date_gmt":"2022-05-26T10:58:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/?p=3059"},"modified":"2022-07-06T14:24:36","modified_gmt":"2022-07-06T14:24:36","slug":"social-care-workforce","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/integratedcarejournal.com\/social-care-workforce\/","title":{"rendered":"The social care workforce: Overworked, undervalued and poorly paid"},"content":{"rendered":"
The crisis<\/a> facing social care is fundamentally a workforce one, and low pay and poor working conditions are impacting the experience of staff and end users alike.<\/p>\n One Network member described the long journey they have had with trying to find carers for their son, and how \u201cthe problems with the social care workforce have now caused [their] son to receive inadequate care\u201d. For the Network member, it was evident that poor conditions for workers make it difficult to consistently provide high levels of care.<\/p>\n The Network members emphasised that social care can be a fulfilling and worthwhile career. However, one member expressed that \u201cNobody talks about it.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cNobody talks about the difference they\u2019ve made to somebody\u2019s life, somebody who lived at home and couldn\u2019t manage independently anymore, and their friends and family were under enormous pressure,\u201d they explained.<\/p>\n A social care career is a skilled and challenging career route, but tends not to be publicly regarded as one. Social care must become a more attractive and respected career path for students.<\/p>\n Network members with experience working in universities noted that very few students harbour ambitions to go into social care, with greater ambition being shown towards childcare, social work, the NHS or physiotherapy. Put simply by one network member, \u201cthere is simply no ambition to be an adult social care worker\u201d.<\/p>\n Improved advertising campaigns offer one solution. One network member shared a heart-warming TikTok showing the day-to-day life of a carer supporting a disabled adult, showing that his profession was not simply that of a support worker, but a \u201cgym buddy\u201d, a \u201cswim coach\u201d, a \u201ckaraoke performer\u201d, a \u201cculinary professor\u201d, and a \u201cLego architect\u201d.<\/p>\n The video showcased the bond he has with the individual he cares for and the varied tasks in his working day, demonstrating the positive aspects of a career in social care. The Network member suggested that it “might inform recruitment campaigns\u201d for social care in England.<\/p>\n Network members were in general agreement that social care requires a clearer career trajectory. If there was a visible route for progression within the system, the sector would be more attractive to young, bright school leavers and university graduates. It was suggested that cross sector career paths should be formed.<\/p>\n \u201cNo one in any career expects to progress without spending time in different departments; we need to do the same in social care and for its providers\u201d, said one member.<\/p>\n To attract more people to the sector, there needs to be greater clarity of the differentiation in provision. Not every member of the caring profession does the same job there are a variety of roles, areas of expertise, and levels of seniority which people should be made aware of.<\/p>\n We must make caring into a proud profession in its own right, not something that is ancillary to nursing.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n A career in social care may be more attractive if it were formally recognised. One Network member criticized the care certificate as it is not an accredited qualification. The only way that the care certificate would be accredited through the QCF would be through the employer hiring a qualified assessor \u201cand the cost of that for the employer is astronomical, so most employers don\u2019t do that\u201d. This makes the care certificate \u201calmost redundant and it certainly doesn\u2019t attract young people to the sector to see it as a long-term career\u201d.<\/p>\n One network member mentioned that Florence Nightingale is generally crediting with \u201cprofessionalising\u201d the role of nurses, and that the Royal College of Nursing was later founded at a time when, arguably, nurses were performing many of the hands-on caring jobs performed today by care assistants.<\/p>\n The network member added \u201cas far as I can ascertain, They Royal College of Nursing does currently admit some care assistants, but only those working in roles directly supervised by nurses .This excludes most care workers. We must make caring into a proud profession in its own right, not something that is ancillary to nursing\u201d. The network member added that there is perhaps a case to be made for the establishment of a College of Care Assistants or workers.<\/p>\n Care workers should be paid fairly for the value of their work, and the level of skill and expertise required.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Across the Network, there has been a consistent consensus that carers must receive better pay, and the latest meeting showed no change of course on this point.<\/p>\n It was described as \u201cscandalous\u201d that professions such as retail work and cleaning are paid more than social care, despite being less technically and emotionally demanding. One Network member, as a provider of care, expressed outrage that \u201c[they] get to pay \u00a310 an hour in a town where you can get \u00a315 for dog walking, how can this be conducive to successful recruitment and retention?\u201d<\/p>\n While there was widespread agreement on the fact that carers are underpaid, some Network members warned against the idea of increasing pay to be a cure all to the current workforce crisis.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is an unnerving conflation between the rate at which staff should be paid for their skills, and whether that will attract them to work in the sector. These two things are being confused. Care workers should be paid fairly for the value of their work, and the level of skill and expertise required, which is not the same as raising pay in the hope that the system would receive an influx of workers.\u201d<\/p>\n This point serves to emphasize that any changes to the workforce must start with a fundamental change in attitudes toward social care work, and \u201cthis will then lead to a conversation about what we pay our professional staff\u201d.<\/p>\nSocial care: A fulfilling and worthwhile career<\/h3>\n
A clear career trajectory<\/h3>\n
Recognising social care qualifications<\/h3>\n
Better pay for care staff<\/h3>\n
Support and collaboration<\/h3>\n